How Dilapidated Infrastructures Denies Dar Opportunities


By ADAM IHUCHA -- Poor infrastructures are denying Tanzania opportunity to exploit its geographical comparative advantage as a regional trade gateway and logistical hub.
The African Development Bank (AfDB) says in a new report that greater economic activity; enhanced efficiency and increased competitiveness are hampered by inadequate transport infrastructures.
Transport systems in Tanzania are mainly ports, roads, rail, air and pipeline, but the AfDB transport review report says that all are in bad shape, save for under construction pipeline.

Situation is more critical on seaports, particularly Dar es Salaam harbor and the entire railway system, the study shows.

AfDB report puts it clear that the investment to breathe life into these facilities is beyond the country’s economic muscles and it recommends the public-private-partnership (PPPs) and development partners as the few options on the table for the country to source finance.

The main seaports, especially Dar es Salaam port, which provides vital access to world markets for six landlocked countries, is now constrained by inadequate space to store and process containers.

Again, the demise of rail services has resulted in a significant loss of traffic to road transport and the latter has benefitted from substantial investment in the trunk road network.

“The collapse of services has had a dramatic impact on trade in the central corridor. For businesses that use the railway, it has resulted in a steep increase in transportation costs” AfDB reads in part.

Both seaport and railway networks serve a large market, which includes the whole of the country’s hinterland and the landlocked countries of Burundi, Rwanda, DR Congo, Uganda, Zambia and Malawi.

Recent economic indicators for this region shows that it has about 168 million people, a combined GDP of $83 billion and an annual volume of trade exceeding $27 billion.

Seaport
Dar port was designed at a time prior to the introduction of containerization and was also designed for the direct transfer of small volumes of cargo direct from ship to rail and road modes.

As a consequence of changing technologies, the available space in the port footprint is now too small to cater to the volume of trade.

This has been one of the primary reasons for increasing congestion and added inefficiency and delay.

The World Bank’s third Tanzania Economic Update report shows, among other things, that container vessels transporting imported merchandise were on average queuing for 10 days just to be able to berth at the Dar Port, as well as an additional 10 days to unload the merchandise, clear it and transport it from the premises.

Drawing comparisons mostly between the Mombasa port, which is the largest in East Africa trailed by Dar es Salaam as well as international standards, the report depicts the symptoms of the port’s inefficiency.

It took less than a day for a ship to berth in Mombasa in 2012, while dwell time also lasted only about three to four days, which is close to international standards of two days. 

To make the matters worse, Dar charges fees in proportion to the value of the merchandise, a practice that is prone to manipulation and corruption, and which could explain why official fees at the port are on average 74 per cent higher than in Mombasa where they charge simple flat rates. 

WB report indicates that the cost of these inefficiencies alone translates into a tariff of 22 per cent on container imports and about five per cent on bulk imports.

“These inefficiencies created financial losses for shippers and shipping companies, resulting in increases to their inventory, storage and anchorage costs. These costs are in general passed on to consumers,” reads the report titled ‘Opening the Gates: How the port of Dar es Salaam can transform Tanzania,’ and authored by Jacques Morisset, the Lead Economist for Tanzania, Burundi and Uganda.

By the WB’s estimation, an average household would save $147 a year or 8.5 per cent of total expenditures – typically with the toll being harder on the poorest households – if the Dar es Salaam port were to be as efficient as Mombasa.

More figures served up in the Economic Update portray the grave costs to both the domestic and international level stakeholders as a result of the port’s inefficiency:

Nearly 37 per cent – the equivalent tariff on total energy imports, which constitute 35.5 per cent of total imports, as a result of long delays.

According to the WB, a total of $252 million losses incurred by shippers and shipping companies in total annual anchorage costs, as a result of long delay annually.

About $17.4 per tonne is the cost that an importer of merchandise worth $1,358 is willing to pay in bribes to speed up processes.

As if that was not enough, roughly $1,759 million is the total welfare loss to the Tanzanian economy as a result of the port’s inefficiency, whereas landlocked countries lose $830 million per annum.

“TPA and Tanzania Revenue Authority are also losing about $157 million,” reads the WB report.

Dar is the country’s largest port with an annual throughput of about 13.5 million tons a year in 2013, but AfDB report warned that the harbor location’s finite capacity would reach in 2020.

Investments
Whereas inadequate infrastructure could be the biggest threat to Tanzania’s long-term growth, it also represented a significant opportunity for investors.

The port capacity constraints urgently need to be addressed and include direct investment, such as additional container berth capacity, improvement of general cargo berths 1 to 7, dredging needs, and relocation of Kurasini Oil Jetty. 

Tanzania Ports Authority (TPA) says it needs partners to improve performance of Dar port by increasing annual cargo traffic from 13.5 million tonnes in 2013 to 18 million tonnes come 2015, which is about 30 per cent growth.

The Dar Port Manager, Mr Awadh Massawe says the target will only be achieved through modernization of infrastructure and enhancement of operational efficiency, maximization of spatial efficiency.

In order to be able to deepening berths 1-7 as well as modernizing bulk cargo handling, Mr Masawe says TPA seeks $213.572 million and he implores investors to chip in.

“We also need $170 million for access channel and turning circle dredging; $360 million for entrance channel dredging; $1.5 million for feasibility study for new proposed port at Mbwamaji and $3 million for feasibility study of the entrance channel and geo-technical survey” he noted.

To mitigate the congestion, investments should also be made in off-port inland container depots, improved intermodal interface between the port, rail, and roads subsectors.

AfDB report underlined the need for better handling capacity for bulk cargoes and container logistics; and improved connectivity between the port and its service hinterland by better road and rail networks in the vicinity of the port.

Furthermore, improvements to the administrative processes and elimination of bureaucracy need to be identified and implemented.

Overall, this long list of requirements will require a large investment.

Investment in the direct port requirements within the existing port footprint will require more than $1 billion, which is beyond the current capacity of TPA to provide.

“It is therefore necessary to explore outside the-box solutions as the “usual” channels of investment from government, TPA and development partners will not be sufficient to meet the large requirements” reads the AfDB study.

In march 2013; Tanzania and China signed a deal that will see the latter construct a multi-billion-dollars port at Bagamoyo district in Coast region, northwest of Dar es Salaam.

Bankrolled by the China state-owned Export-Import Bank (EXIM) at the tune of $10 billion, the dock is designed to be largest and ultra-modern in African continent.

Details show that the harbor is anticipated to be ready by 2017 and will be able to handle 20 times more cargo than Dar es Salaam port, the current major imports and exports gateway in East African, competing with Mombasa dock.

Dar and China-state-run-firm, Merchants Holdings (International) also contained the building of a 34km road between Baga­moyo and Mlandizi, which will link the port to Tanzania's internal rail network and the Tanzania-Zam­bia railway.

Railway
The key issue in the subsector concerns is the revival of Tanzania Railway Ltd (TRL). The demise of rail services has resulted in a significant loss of traffic to road transport and the latter has benefitted from substantial investment in the trunk road network.

The collapse of services has had a dramatic impact on trade in the central corridor. For businesses that use the railway, it has resulted in a steep increase in transportation costs.

This has had considerable adverse impact on the international trade routes with the neighbouring countries of Rwanda, Burundi, DR Congo and Uganda.

Under the new five-year transport sector investment plan commenced in July 2012, the government has placed considerable emphasis on addressing railways and, in particular, the revival of the central rail corridor linking Dar es Salaam with the lake ports of Kigoma and Mwanza.

The proposed allocations under the plan amount to $130 million for railways, which is equivalent to 10.6 percent of the total allocation for the transport sector in the next five years.

The good news is that plans are underway for TRL to secure a large chunk of the funds from the state-owned-TIB development bank to support the infrastructure improvements associated with the revival plan.

The Minister for Transport, Dr Harrison Mwakyembe, said that mid February 2014, TIB development bank signed a memorandum of understanding with the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) worth $130 million to support infrastructure in Tanzania.

The MoU was signed by DBSA Chief Executive, Mr Patrick Dlamini and TIB's Managing Director, Mr Patrick Noni and will benefit various vital projects.

Among the benefits of the financing of projects by the banks will be that TRL will be able to transport three million tonnes of goods per year by 2015 and allow Tanzania Airport Authority (TAA) to double its handling capacity for both Mwanza and Arusha airports.

Other projects include several prospective ports rehabilitation and expansion including Dar port berth 1 to 7 at the cost of $600 million after a feasibility study had been conducted and financed by DBSA and Mtwara port and a number of other projects in the water and energy sectors.

"Our cooperation and co-financing with DBSA are in line with our collective objectives of supporting economic growth through development to ensure rapid and sustainable infrastructure development of the country," said Mr Noni.

Dr. Mwakyembe said that if all goes well, the funds would be disbursed by TIB to the TRL, TAA and TPA in the next two months.

The key requirements for the Tanzania and Zambia railway (TAZARA) are for additional capital and a strengthened business plan to underpin improvements in service delivery and operational effectiveness.

Given the close involvement of China with the railway since its inception, the future plan for its development will require common agreement of the three governments.

“It is preferable that the three governments agree to proceed with a review of the current operations” AfDB report reads.

The AfDB says the review should include the possibility of bringing in the private sector to strengthen the business and management of the railway as well as examine if it is possible to introduce open access to offer competitive services on the line.


Roads
Over the next five years, the country needs $5.141 billions for roads development alone, which is approximately 64 percent of funds required for transport sector as a whole.

This is equivalent to an expenditure of about $1 billion a year over the next plan period.

AfDB report indicates a 68 percent of these funds will carry overdue projects, mostly that have been contracted, but have yet to commence construction.

The good news is that the development partners will meet a portion of this funding requirement.

In real terms, development partners indicate to foot somewhere around $1.050 billion, which is equivalent to 20 percent of the overall investment budget.

For local roads, the investment budget is estimated at $493 million equivalent or 6.2 percent of the total transport program, excluding possible support from development partners.

The proposed budgeted amounts, which increase from $61 million in 2012/2013 to $124 million in 2016/17 is expected to increase the length of local roads in good condition from about 13,000km at present to 15,000km at the end of the plan period.

The length of local roads in fair condition are projected to increase from 19,600 km at present to 26,600 km at the end of the plan while roads in poor condition are projected to decrease from 25,400 km at present to 16,400 km over the 5 year period.

While the total expenditure for local roads is not high, the developmental impacts is noteworthy at the local level, as accessibility will significantly improve in those rural areas currently constrained by poor access.

Despite the relatively small allocations in relation to the size of the network and its current condition, the proposed investment is a significant increase over allocations provided during the current plan.

 A significant constraint concerns the lack of finance to support urban transport proposals.

The master plan study indicated that an investment of $4 billion would be required over the period to 2030, which is equivalent to $200 million a year, which is well beyond the currently available resources.

Airport
The country has also secured $164.3 million from the Netherlands for the expansion of the Julius Nyerere International Airport in Dar es Salaam to ease pressing capacity constraints.

Director general of the Tanzania Aviation Authority (TAA) Engineer, Suleiman Suleiman, said the airport’s original capacity was tailored to handle 1.2 million passengers per year, but the current use is nearly twice that number at over 2 million passengers. 

TAA Chief said the first phase of the project will grow the airport’s capacity to 3.5 million passengers, and Phase Two will increase the capacity by a further 2.5 million passengers annually.

Kilimanjaro International Airport (KIA) will also undergo major rehabilitation that will cost Euro 35 million, $48.1 million (Tsh75billion). 

The funds have already sourced from Orio Grant Facility of The Netherlands with Euro 15million being a grant and Euro 20million a loan to the government of Tanzania under concessionary terms.

The money would be used to rehabilitate the runway, apron, taxiways and the passengers’ terminal, according to Bakari Murusuri, the Director of Finance and corporate Services of the Kilimanjaro Airports Development Company (KADCO) which manages the airport.

Mr Murusuri says the rehabilitation programme is expected to commence in June 2014 and will take about three years to be completed.

AfDB report shows that at present, there are over 3 million air passengers a year of which approximately 48 percent are international and 52 percent domestic.

The International passengers are concentrated at 4 airports; Dar, Kilimanjaro, Zanzibar and Arusha, while the bulk of domestic passengers also use these airports plus Mwanza.

For the sector as a whole, the forecasts indicate that the number of air passengers is expected to increase year. This growth rate is in the same range as those predicted by the master plan prefeasibility study.

While the bulk of the passenger traffic uses JNIA in Dar es Salaam, the global growth takes into account the small traffic volumes of most airports.

Overall, the country has 368 airports with the TAA responsible for 58 airports on the mainland.

The majority of the airports are private airfields owned by mining companies and tour operators.

CONVERSATION

0 comments:

Post a Comment