Tanzania's National Parks Become No-Drones Flying Zone

By ADAM IHUCHA --Tanzania’s national parks’ airspaces have been declared a no-drones flying zone, as the country banned the high-tech aircrafts in its bid to intensify security in the wake of escalating poaching.

High demand for flying drones in national parks’ skies rises as the unmanned aircrafts become more popular, compounded by hobbyists, who create films for both leisure and commercial purposes.

“As of November 6, 2014, the use of drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) of any size for photo taking, filming and any other purpose is not allowed in the national parks for security reasons” reads part of Tanzania National Parks (TANAPA)’s statement.

Tanapa though doesn’t specify the so-called security reasons, there’s a speculation that poachers could use the drones for mapping out places where elephants and rhinos concentrate in the sprawling national parks.

Last month, poachers shot dead two elephants and chopped off their ivory in Serengeti National park, amid a maximum security, leaving authority with reservations. 

TANAPA’s Public Relations Manager, Mr. Pascal Shelutete says that there are serious concerns about the potential; negative impact that flying unmanned aircraft can cause in parks.

“So, we have decided to prohibit their use until we can determine the most appropriate policy that will protect park resources” he clarified.

The ban targets all drones and UAVs used for any purpose in the country’s 16 parks.

This means pilots of hobbyists’ drones and UAVs will no longer be allowed to fly their gadgets in Serengeti, Mount Kilimanjaro, Tarangire, Lake Manyara, Arusha, Gombe Stream, Katavi, Kitulo, Mahale, Mikumi, Mkomazi Ruaha, Rubondo Island, Saadani, Saa Nane Island and Udzungwa Mountain national parks.

If the need arises, the Tanapa director general will exclusively consider allowing the usage of these high technologies after a thorough scrutiny of the application.

“In this regard, we ask all tour operators to notify their clients and assist in the compliance of this public notice. The same applies to all visitors intending to do filming in the parks,” the statement reads in part.

Mr Shelutete says drones and UAV are the latest high-tech tools with which officials are not conversant with its operations, leading to the fear of jeopardising security.

“There’re no clear guidelines on how the drones and UAVs can fly over national parks’ skies without compromising security,” Mr Shelutete says.

“It is foreign operators only who currently know what they are doing with the gadgets, this is quite unacceptable,” he adds in an interview.

However, Tanzania Civil Aviation Authority (TCAA) says there’s a proper regulation for allowing drone operators’ unfettered access to the skies, similar to model aircraft.

“We have legislation for anything that access our airspace, that’s why the UAVs were allowed to fly in a trial basis with a view to support the country’s anti-poaching initiatives in future,” TCAA acting director general Charles Chacha says in a separate interview over the phone.

Arguing that the drones and the UAVs are currently flying across the world, Mr Chacha does not cite any law in Tanzania that permits the machines to access the sky.

A source from within the aviation industry says there’s no drone-specific regulation and that the TCAA is attempting to finagle existing aircraft regulations and apply them to the gadgets, even when the legislation clearly does not exist.

Tanzania Association of Tour Operators CEO Sirili Akko, nonetheless, commends Tanapa for its bold decision, saying it is for the very best interest of the nation. 

“However, I challenge them to be well equipped technologically in a bid to identify and deal with such things accordingly without causing inconveniences to holidaymakers,” Mr Akko notes.

One of the UAVs operators, Mr Mike Chambers, who successfully used the gadgets for monitoring Tarangire National Park last month, supports the Tanapa’s stance, saying it is imperative to control the machines.

“In the Bathawks Company’s case; we had extensive discussions with Tanapa before we tested specific anti-poaching equipment.

“But Tanapa just can’t allow every Dick and Tom to fly any machine. The responsible way is to take control and only allow authorised activities,” Mr Chambers says.

The use of the UAVs for aerial survey is envisioned to help stop the senseless killing of over 10,000 elephants and thousands of other wildlife in Tanzania.

The trials are part of latest efforts by the private sector to compliment the government’s anti- poaching initiatives through private public partnership.

Natural Resources and Tourism minister Lazaro Nyalandu says in a long-term basis, they will look for suitable drones to intensify anti-poaching squad in Serengeti.

Tanzania has been under close scrutiny over the commercial-scale slaughter of its elephants.

Indeed, available data paints a harsh reality as it shows the country is losing 30 elephants a day, or nearly 11,000 a year.

Almost a half of the country's elephants have been shot, speared or poisoned since 2007, leaving barely 60,000 in total. Going by the present poaching appetite, Tanzania's elephants will be extinct within five years.

Tawiri’s latest report shows the giant Selous Game Reserve -- UNESCO World Heritage Site that boasted accommodating 38,975 elephants in 2009 -- now has barely 13,084.
Covering 50,000 km2, Selous -- the largest protected area in the world – is renowned for its large numbers of elephants and other big game.

But rampant poaching has brought about a dramatic decline in its elephant and rhino populations whose numbers have significantly been shrinking since the reserve was listed as the World Heritage Site in 1982.

The current poaching crisis began in Central Africa about a decade ago and has since shifted to East Africa, where as many as 25,000 elephants were killed in Tanzania’s Selous ecosystem -- 66 per cent of the reserve’s population -- between 2009 and 2013, prompting UNESCO’s decision to add it to its list of the World Heritage Sites at risk.

CONVERSATION

0 comments:

Post a Comment